Wednesday, 18 March 2020

Congregational Bible Experience Day #67: 1 Timothy 1-3

Paul gets quickly down to business (v3-8) addressing the matter of those teaching "false doctrines".  It's the, by now familiar (remember Galatians and Philippians?), story of a misguided, heavy-handed, Gospel-bypassing legalism that wants to enforce law-keeping as a (or better, 'the'?) means of staying close to God. Paul is having none of it (v7), and neither should Timothy (v3). For Paul, the goal of ministry among the fellowship is love (v5) - love for God, for the church family and for God's truth, which can never be achieved by legalistic means. Rather, such love can only flow "from a pure heart (literally, a 'cleansed heart'), a good conscience and a sincere faith", in other words, from a heart humbled, regenerated and renewed by the Gospel.  Legalism remains attractive because observing rules and regulations enables someone to appear (externally) holy without having to change their hearts (internally). They are however, still culpable and accountable to God for their sin.

And yet, the law is not unimportant in the life of the believer. Verses 8-11 provide a helpful summary of the difference between sinful legalism and godly obedience of the law. The goodness of the law (v8) is that it reveals both the character of God's holiness and spells out our own sinfulness (v9b-10). It creates within us an awareness of our moral guilt before a righteous God and that we are totally incapable of meeting its stringent demands, showing us our need of mercy, forgiveness and cleansing, and leads us to Christ as the only true law-keeper and our only hope of salvation through faith in Him. The law was never intended to be the means by which are made right and kept right with God (v9). That's the purpose of "the glorious Gospel of the blessed God" (v11).

We're perhaps used thinking of 'A-list' sin in the descriptive terms that Paul uses in verses 9b-10. When we hear the testimony of someone converted from such a spiritually hard-boiled background we praise God for the power of the Gospel in saving such a sin-twisted soul. But here (v12-17), in self-identifying as the worst of all sinners (v15), Paul is equating gross sinfulness with his own pre-conversion, egotistical, religious and legalistic arrogance. Paul's former history and experience of sin is not so much characterised by all-out 'badness' - as the world might define 'badness' - but by sin-hardened, self-righteous legalistic 'goodness' (even though this did lead to the fanatical persecution of believers:  Acts 8:3; Phil 3:6). Paul's point in this passage, is to encourage Timothy to remember that any sinful person - even a merciless, moralistic legalist like himself - can be saved (v14)!  So don't lose heart, he writes: even those deluded by their own false, law-obsessed teaching can be reached with the Gospel and be changed (v16).  To God be the glory (v17)! 

Chapter 2 opens with some of Paul's direct and non-negotiable instructions regarding the public life of the local church.  His priority for the church as it gathers together is, perhaps surprisingly, prayer: prayer for all peoples generally (v1) and for government leaders particularly (v2), so that Christian believers might be enabled to live "quiet and peaceable lives" (v2) in their pursuit of godliness in the middle of a God-resistant culture (v2-4).  All the more important, then, that their humble faith (v8) finds its focus upon Jesus the mediator (v5) and as the ransom (v6).

The chapter continues with another passage often cited as displaying Paul's overtly misogynistic tendencies (v9-15).  From his compassion, wisdom and appreciation of women in active service in the churches that we have read of elsewhere, such a negative critique of his 'attitudes to women' seems simplistic and out of character. To me, it seems possible that Paul is addressing a local, culture issue from a Biblical perspective. Ephesus, where Timothy was helping the church, was a particularly 'liberated' (!?) city for women (you can google the 'goddess' Diana of the Ephesians to get an idea of her dominant influence!) and aspects of that cultural normality may well have unhelpfully drifted into church life. Other questions in your minds about this must remain for another time…  

Finally, and briefly, chapter 3 outlines Paul' s requirements of those who would "nobly" (v1) serve as church leaders, particularly their role and necessary qualifications for such service. Note the "must be…" of verse 2. Church history and the development of different practices have diverged on Paul's model to give us present day Bishops (Episcopalian traditions) and elders (Presbyterian traditions). Nevertheless, the general principles remain: overseers, bishops, elders are entrusted with the spiritual shepherding, feeding and maturing of the flock as the Bible is taught and applied, guarding them from the false and destructive teaching of ravenous wolves, and helping them to grow together in faith, hope and love. Their lives are really to morally model and illustrate their teaching and pastoral love (v2-7), although in many ways the standard Paul sets is of one of consistency rather than that of 'super-sainthood'. These God-centred qualities ought to the aim of everyone living for Christ.  Deacons (v8-12), those entrusted with the care of more practical matters of church life to free elders up for other pressing matters (see Acts 6:1-7), ought also to be living lives of exemplary Christlikeness (v16), so that together as a church we live out Gospel truth before a watching world (v15). And in our current circumstances, there's no time like the present to demonstrate to others the difference to life that faith in Jesus brings.    

No comments: